Warning on legal aid rationing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Legal aid cases will be turned down for purely budgetary reasons if demand is higher than expected under the Government's planned new scheme, Gary Streeter, parliamentary secretary at the Lord Chancellor's Department, made plain yesterday.
Confirmation that the proposed reforms, which would introduce fixed budgets for the first time, envisage rationing of services came as the minister warned solicitors at a legal aid conference in Cardiff not to "sacrifice the opportunity to influence change by trying to resist the inevitable, as happened with conveyancing in the 1980s".
The White Paper setting out the planned changes proposes a new test of whether a case "deserves a share of public funds available".
Mr Streeter said: "It must be possible to turn away less important cases if demand is higher than expected, while making sure that some resources are always available to meet priority needs." Patricia Wynn Davies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments