War in the Balkans: War Crimes - `Haven' an option for Serb leader
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC could be spared an international war crimes trial by being given sanctuary in a non-Nato nation, according to senior diplomats in Brussels who are wrestling with the obstacles remaining in the path of a settlement to the Kosovo crisis.
With a consensus that the international community must not give the Yugoslav president immunity from prosecution, the alliance is discussing other possibilities if it has to deal with him. Asked about his fate, one senior diplomat said that "there are countries around the world that can give haven".
The consideration being given to the future of President Milosevic reflects growing confidence that the bombing campaign will yield results in eight weeks, producing the environment for an endgame.
Some of the alliance's most senior figures believe that the Yugoslav leader may be swept from power by popular dissent. This is the "Ceausescu scenario", referring to the Romanian dictator shot dead in December 1989. Another scenario would see him ousted by his inner circle. But with no clear sign of either of these emerging, another diplomat recalled the fate of Idi Amin, who was offered sanctuary abroad to hasten the end of his bloody regime in Uganda.
Such an outcome would anger many human rights activists who want Mr Milosevic to face trial not only for ethnic cleansing in Kosovo but also for earlier atrocities in Bosnia.
However diplomats say it would be preferable to him continuing in power. With President Milosevic likely to demand immunity in any negotiations, an agreed haven for him and his family is seen as a possible solution that might assist a deal that avoids the need for Nato troops to fight their way into Kosovo.
Yesterday the alliance spokesman, Peter Daniel, refused to say whether the alliance would negotiate with President Milosevic, or who would sign an eventual agreement, but he added: "At the end of the day an agreement takes two. There will be one party, Nato, and the other, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia."
There was no mention of which state the Serb leader would be most likely to find refuge in. One possibility is Belarus. An Orthodox Slav state, the leadership of the former Soviet republic shares President Milosevic's antipathy to all things Western and, above all, to Nato.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments