Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

War in the Balkans: Diplomatic Solution: Kosovo invasion ruled out by French

John Lichfield
Monday 19 April 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A CAPITULATION by the Yugoslav President, Slobodan Milosevic, is not essential to end Nato's war in the Balkans, according to French sources. Once the Serb military machine has been crushed, and is no longer capable of resistance, the West could achieve its aims through a diplomatic solution brokered at the United Nations, which Belgrade would have to tolerate.

An international force, possibly under the flag of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, would then take possession of Kosovo and escort the refugees back.

Despite the deepening humanitarian catastrophe in Kosovo, and increasing impatience in Western public opinion, French sources say Nato governments have no intention of mounting a land invasion. In Nato circles the view is that international forces would not enter Kosovo until a "semi- permissive environment" had been achieved: in other words when the Serbs recognise that they are powerless to resist, even though they do not formally surrender.

Paris believes the alliance is weeks away from achieving the necessary degree of destruction of Serb infrastructure and military capability. But it would take even longer to assemble a ground force capable of invading Kosovo.

Such an invasion would cause even greater suffering to the Kosovars, French officials say, and would risk causing a wider conflict in the region.

More and more voices in France - as elsewhere - have been questioning this obsession with a limited war, in which all the risks are run by Kosovars and Serb civilians (and the Serb military), but not by alliance soldiers, and only in a limited way by alliance pilots.

The newspaper Le Mondesaid at the weekend that the attritional approach favoured by Nato was failing. But French officials insist that a combination of air power and diplomacy can still win the war. They say that there is no fundamental difference between the allies on the need for a diplomatic endgame. Paris has been the most insistent in calling for Russia to be kept in play; but all the allies accept that it is essential to avoid a Russian veto in the UN.

It is widely accepted, the French say, that the best solution would be a UN security council resolution, encapsulating the Rambouillet peace accord on Kosovo, which would be imposed de facto on Belgrade.

The French reject any suggestion that they are ready to break ranks to seek a diplomatic compromise. They say that France - which has 60 planes operational in the Balkans, 20 more than Britain - is committed to continuing the air war for as long as necessary.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in