Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

War In The Balkans: Blair's vision of global police

Nato Summit

Colin Brown
Thursday 22 April 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TONY BLAIR set out a new doctrine last night for intervention in global conflicts to secure international peace and security through co-operation.

Foreshadowing reforms to both the UN Security Council and Nato, Mr Blair said in a wide-ranging speech in Chicago that international actions needed to be taken at an earlier stage, as Kosovo demonstrated. "The most pressing foreign policy problem we face is to identify the circumstances in which we should get actively involved in other people's conflicts," he said.

Non-interference had long been considered an important principle of international order and it was not one that Britain wanted to jettison too readily.

"But the principle of non- interference must be qualified in important respects. Acts of genocide can never be a purely internal matter. When oppression produces massive flows of refugees which unsettle neighbouring countries then they can properly be described as threats to international peace and security."

Mr Blair appeared to suggest greater intervention by Nato adopting a role as global policeman, which will be resisted by unaligned states, Russia and China. Sources close to Mr Blair said he was not proposing to change the system under which China and Russia routinely vetoed Nato action.

But Mr Blair, and it is believed President Clinton, have become increasingly frustrated with the reluctance of Nato to act, sometimes until it is too late. Mr Blair put forward five main tests for intervention: Are we sure of our case? Have we exhausted all diplomatic options? Are there military operations we can sensibly and prudently undertake? Are we prepared for the long term? And do we have national interests involved?

He said: "In the past we have talked too much of exit strategies. But having made a commitment we cannot simply walk away once the fight is over - better to stay with moderate numbers of troops than return for repeat performances with large numbers."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in