Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Voting for a New Britain: Lobbyist gifts are banned for Scots

Fran Abrams
Thursday 29 April 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MEMBERS OF the Scottish Parliament are to be barred from taking lobbyists' cash or gifts under new rules far stricter than those in Westminster.

The move comes as lobbying companies prepare to cash in on devolution. Many big London-based firms now have offices in Edinburgh and Cardiff, and several indigenous companies have also sprung up.

Several Edinburgh law firms have set up lobbying arms, hoping to make money by drafting amendments to legislation on behalf of commercial clients.

Lord Fraser of Carmyllie, a former Conservative deputy leader in the House of Lords and a Scottish Office and industry minister in the last government, is chairman of the newly formed Holyrood Strategy (Scotland). The Liberal Democrats' federal treasurer, Denis Robertson Sullivan, is managing director of PS Public Affairs.

But while Westminster MPs are allowed to take on consultancies with lobbying firms, their Scottish counterparts will be told that such positions are "inappropriate". In Wales therules will reflect those at Westminster, where such interests must merely be registered.

The conclusions of a working group on rules for Scottish Parliament members, expected to be approved by the Parliament, says MSPs should be barred from taking fees not only from commercial lobbyists but also from PR firms or lawyers who are pressing for particular policies.

The code of conduct "should be a powerful tool in discouraging MSPs and lobbyists from participating in irregular activities", the working group said.

"We consider that it is inappropriate for any MSP to receive payment in cash or kind from any firm engaged in lobbying on a commercial basis."

Some lobbyists and politicians believe the group should have introduced compulsory registration for lobbying firms. They would then have to sign up to rules likely to bar them from offering cash to politicians for favours or from appointing politicians to their boards, as the existing voluntary code does.

Robbie MacDuff, managing director of Strategy in Scotland, the Edinburgh branch of the English lobbying firm Westminster Strategy, said it was "naive" to think lobbyists could regulate themselves. "I don't think Scotland is so special that it will work here when it doesn't work in London," he said. "In an industry where people are chums, there are too many temptations."

Mr MacDuff questioned whether members of the House of Lords should be allowed to work for Scottish lobbying firms. In England, peers must declare their lobbying interests.

Lord Sempill, a hereditary peer who runs Holyrood Strategy (Scotland), chaired by Lord Fraser of Carmyllie, defended his right to be in the business. The peers were told that they did not need to register their interest in the House of Lords' register of members' interests.

Lord Sempill is standing as a Conservative for the Scottish Parliament but does not expect to win. "Quite frankly, I have to have a career. I think we clearly understand amongst ourselves in the fraternity that there is a conflict of interests in holding an active role in a public affairs company and at the same time being part of the political process," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in