Virginia prosecutor finds 2018 police shooting justified
A Virginia prosecutor has found that the fatal police shooting of an unarmed Black man who ran onto a highway during a mental health crisis was justified
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The fatal police shooting of an unarmed Black man who ran onto a highway during a mental health crisis was justified, a Virginia prosecutor said Friday.
The finding by Commonwealth's Attorney Colette McEachin mirrors an earlier finding by her predecessor, former Commonwealth's Attorney Michael Herring. McEachin said in a 10-page report released Friday that the officer's use of deadly force on Marcus-David Peters was a “reasonable response” to the danger posed by Peters.
Peters was a 24-year-old high school biology teacher when he was shot by a Richmond police officer on May 14, 2018.
Police said Peters struck several vehicles with his car, then crashed into brush in a grassy area next to a highway ramp. Body camera video showed Peters climb out of his car — naked— and run into rush hour traffic on Interstate 95. He laid down on the highway, rolled around and flailed his arms and legs.
The officer, who was also Black, pointed a stun gun at Peters, who then ran toward the officer while shouting and threatening to kill him. The officer deployed the stun gun, which appeared to have no effect, then shot Peters with his service weapon.
Peters died later at a hospital.
Three months later, Herring cleared the officer of any wrongdoing, finding that a reasonable officer in those circumstances would have believed Peters was capable of overcoming him and taking control of his gun.
At the urging of Peters' family and police reform advocates, McEachin agreed to review the case. She reached a similar conclusion, finding that “the officer's ultimate decision to use lethal force was a reasonable response to the imminent danger presented to himself and the public by Mr. Peters' continued violent behavior due to his mental deterioration.”
Peters’ sister, Princess Blanding, said the officer — who said over his police radio that he was dealing with a man who was “mentally unstable” — should not have used deadly force on someone who was in the throes of a mental health crisis.
She said Friday that she disagrees with McEachin's finding.
“Marcus was not violent toward anyone. He ran to the highway. He was not violent to anybody. He was in his own world,” Blanding said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.