Victory for estate agents in bungalow test case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Estate agents won a test case victory in the High Court yesterday after insisting they could not always be held responsible for property advertisements that include false claims.
The case followed the discovery that a bungalow put on the market in Enfield, north London, in 1994, as part of the pounds 130,000 sale of a four- bedroom house, had no planning permission and faced demolition.
It is the first case to reach the High Court since legislation was introduced three years ago to curb the flowery language and grandiose claims of property adverts that often resulted in disappointment for buyers.
But Lord Justice Kennedy said yesterday that estate agents could not be expected to be responsible for making extra checks on details given to them by owners, unless there were obvious grounds for suspicion.
When Graham Coton, a senior agent at Castle Estate Agents in Enfield, was told that the bungalow - complete with tiled roof and a porch - was legal, he accepted the owner's word. A competing agency was later alerted to the truth.
Lord Kennedy's judgement was welcomed yesterday. Peter Gleeson, chairman of Castle, said: "If this bungalow had looked like a shed, we would have been right to look at it. But it didn't, and it's not the job of an estate agent to check every planning permission situation."
Since the Properties Misdescriptions Act of 1993, advertising has been much more subdued. There have still been 62 cases, with 13 acquittals, in the magistrates courts.
David Perkins, a consultant on the act, said it was effective in curbing old style hyperbole. "Most of the problems now are simply based on mistakes. If you had to check planning permission on every property, you wouldn't know where to stop."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments