Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UTILITIES: Watchdogs' culture of secrecy

Wednesday 30 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Watchdogs contribute to a "culture of secrecy" which blocks consumer access to information, it is claimed today. A report by the Consumers' Association accuses the regulators of being "astonishingly naive" and not pushing hard enough for reliable data from the privatised utility companies they are meant to be monitoring.

It calls on watchdogs to be more rigorous in seeking up to date information and passing it on to consumer groups - or risk ineffective regulation and weak competition.

The report, published in the Consumer Policy Review bulletin, says the regulators are too ready to trust companies to hand over accurate and comprehensive data voluntarily and are then equally ready not to pass on that information to consumers.

Information which is published is often presented in such a confusing way that it makes little sense to consumers, it is claimed.

The report's authors acknowledge that the regulators are themselves being left out in the cold by companies in some cases. They blame laws which assume information is commercially confidential unless disclosure can be shown to be in the public interest.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in