Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

`Unkind' doctors given bitter pill

Celia Hall
Thursday 22 December 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Doctors have lost their bedside manner and are unkind and thoughtless in their dealings with patients, an eminent medical professor says today.

Professor Sir David Weatherall, Regius professor of medicine at Oxford University, argues that hospitals and surgeries have become supermarkets staffed by doctors who are no longer equipped with the basic skills to treat patients as human beings.

The impassioned indictment of medical training and the "narrow specialist" it produces is made by Sir David in the British Medical Journal. Sir David, director of the Institute of Molecular Medicine at Oxford University, says "systems of medical care areno longer geared to support very sick people".

Cancer patients are brought close to death by treatment for tumours. "In almost every field of modern high technology patch-up practice, patients are pushed to the extreme of their endurance and not always for reasons that include a careful appraisal of what is meant by the quality of life.

"Above all else, those with distressing chronic or terminal illness need . . . attention and friendship of one doctor whom they can come to trust . Yet this kind of relationship is all too rarely available to them,'' Sir David says. Reductions in junior doctors' hours meant that patients were looked after by a stream of doctors. The same pattern applies in general practice, where the chances of patients seeing their own doctors are equally limited.

Young people who want to become doctors must decide when they are 15 "from which time they are in effect narrow specialists", he says.

"Many come from comfortable middle-class homes, few will ever have been patients themselves and even fewer will have experienced much of the world outside their immediate circle.

"It is not surprising that many of them have difficulties in adapting to the day-to-day needs of patients of diverse backgrounds and emotional requirements and widely different reactions to adversity." Sir David asks: "Have we . . . evolved an education system that from the very beginning is destined to leave many of its products ill-equipped to deal with the multifaceted needs of sick people?"

He calls for a broader-based education for medical students and for governments to accept that doctors need to spend more time with patients.

Sir David also asks qualified doctors how many of them could "put their hands on their hearts and say that they had never been tempted to to avoid spending time with particularly difficult or distressing patients during the last days of a terminal illness?"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in