Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Unions may have to pay compensation

Barrie Clement
Tuesday 30 July 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If Ian Lang is to be taken seriously, the Government is considering the introduction of a law which would weaken trade unionism to a far greater extent than any legislation introduced since the Conservatives came to power in 1979.

By removing immunities from unions engaged in public- sector strikes, the Government would make it virtually impossible for them to lead or to organise industrial action among five million public-sector employees, and would set the collective rights of workers back a hundred years.

Ministers have divined that the industrial action on the London Underground and at the Royal Mail may have prepared the electorate for the toughest employment legislation contemplated in peace time. It seems increasingly likely that such proposals could be included in the Conservative manifesto, but legislation is unlikely before an election.

Under the proposals, the Communication Workers' Union would be sued by companies which lost business through the present postal dispute. Both the rail unions - Aslef and RMT - would also be liable to legal action for damages incurred through the Tube stoppages.

Mr Lang acknowledges the potentially vast - even limitless - liabilities involved by suggesting immunities might be removed or "reduced".

If unions refused to pay damages - or if they continued to back industrial action - then their assets could be sequestrated by the courts, and their organisational structure would simply cease to exist.

Defiance of the law in the 1980s reduced the National Union of Mineworkers and the print union NGA - among the most powerful unions in the land - to penury.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in