UN lawyers cast doubt over Sierra Leone arms embargo
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE FOREIGN Office is examining a ruling by United Nations lawyers which suggests that it may not have been illegal to sell arms to the Nigerian- led peace-keeping force in Sierra Leone. The UN lawyers' view further confuses the question of whether the UN embargo on arms sales to Sierra Leone was breached by the British firm Sandline International.
Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, has told the Commons that Foreign and Commonwealth officials advised Sandline that the embargo included everyone connected with Sierra Leone. Sandline has maintained it did not break the embargo by supplying arms to Ecomog, the West African force which restored Sierra Leone's elected government under President Kabbah.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments