Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Worker's hovel stands in way of pounds 1.5m housing scheme: City planners are determined to preserve an 18th-century relic. Chris Arnot reports

Chris Arnot
Friday 15 January 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE discovery of a derelict 18th-century agricultural worker's hovel has scuppered plans for a pounds 1.5m housing development in Birmingham.

The city council's planning committee decided on Thursday not to grant permission for the building of 22 starter homes on the site of a former market garden at Jerry's Lane in Erdington. Problems over access were cited, but of prime concern to councillors was how to save a rural relic that has somehow survived in suburbia.

They authorised the serving of a building preservation notice, valid for six months, and resolved to apply to the Department of National Heritage for a permanent listing.

'It's clearly important in terms of the social history of the city,' said the council's head of conservation, Chris Hargreaves. 'For Birmingham it is a unique survival, literally a hidden gem.'

The hovel (defined in the Shorter Oxford Dictionary as a rude or miserable dwelling place, a wretched cabin or cowshed), came to light in October last year after the death of Joe Bateman, whose family had owned the market garden since the 1920s.

The man who found it was Geoffrey Hitchman, a retired butcher and secretary of the Erdington Historical Society.

'I'd often walked along the road, peered through the hedge and wondered what it was,' he said. 'So when I heard the land was being sold for development, I decided to go and have a look around. I trotted off through the undergrowth and there it was, right at the far end. I knew it was old when I saw those two-inch bricks.'

He has traced the hovel's origins back to 1792, when Erdington was a rural village five miles from Birmingham and a man called Samuel Biddle paid 6d for a cottage and a small piece of land.

It was last occupied in 1962 and is in need of extensive repairs. The stairwell has collapsed, the grey-tiled roof sags alarmingly and the floor, which is little more than 10ft square, is covered in rubble. Ivy is already intruding through gaps in the building's structure.

'The city council would be reluctant to take on board the responsibility for renovation,' Mr Hargreaves said. 'It's too small for a museum. Ideally it would be refurbished as a private house.'

An estate agent might describe it as a charming period cottage with two compact bedrooms and many original features, including gas mantles, a cast iron range, a wash-house extension with a copper furnace and a view of the stars.

Crest Homes (Midlands), the would-be developer of the market garden site, is planning a revised application. The company's managing director, John Rossiter, said he was surprised and disappointed by the council's decision.

'We have bent over backwards in our attempts to resolve the problem,' he added. 'We submitted a revised plan confirming our willingness to completely enclose the hovel, but the planners said we have not allowed for a sufficient amount of land to separate it from the new development.'

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in