Blair urged to duck ‘banal’ TV debate with Tory leader Hague, records show
Newly released government files show Labour aides advised there was nothing to gain from an election head-to-head.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prime minister Tony Blair was strongly urged by aides not to give in to opposition demands for a TV debate with his Tory rival in the run-up to the 2001 general election, according to newly released government files.
Televised debates involving the main party leaders have been a feature of UK general elections for more than decade but at the start of the century there was still strong resistance to the idea.
Papers released by the National Archives show that, in January 2001, Mr Blair’s parliamentary private secretary Bruce Grocott wrote to the prime minister advising they were an “irrelevance” which would have no impact on the outcome.
Since then everyone has learned the rules, not least remembering to shave, which has ensured that all subsequent encounters have been bland, banal, no-score draws
“The country with the most experience of TV election debates is the United States and the practice shows that they are neither informative, illuminating, entertaining nor in any way significant in determining the election outcome,” he wrote.
He said the only American example anyone could remember was the 1960 presidential election when an unshaven Richard Nixon, sweating under the studio lights, was widely seen to have come off second best against a clean-cut John Kennedy.
“Since then everyone has learned the rules, not least remembering to shave, which has ensured that all subsequent encounters have been bland, banal, no-score draws,” Mr Grocott added.
Mr Blair’s refusal to engage infuriated Tory leader William Hague and the Liberal Democrats’ Charles Kennedy but, with Labour well ahead in the polls, party strategists saw no reason to agree.
In his memorandum, Mr Grocott argued that – in contrast to the US – the televising of their weekly encounters at Prime Minister’s Questions meant voters in the UK were well-used to seeing the party leaders go head-to-head.
“They are watched by up to one million people and in the course of a parliament cover several hours. Nothing comparable exists in the USA,” he said.
“All previous prime ministers, Labour and Conservatives, whether ahead in the opinion polls or behind, have been consistent in their view that it would not be a good idea to introduce American-style TV debates in Britain and have refused all requests to do so.”
That finally changed in 2010 when Gordon Brown, trailing in the polls, agreed to go head-to-head with David Cameron and Nick Clegg, although it was still not enough to avert a Labour defeat.