Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Streeting did not intend to ‘wade into’ assisted dying debate

The Health Secretary said he is worried that people could feel they have a ‘duty to die’ to relieve the burden on their loved ones.

Helen Corbett
Tuesday 29 October 2024 07:18 EDT
Dame Esther Rantzen said she was ‘disappointed’ by news of Mr Streeting’s decision (Esther Rantzen/PA)
Dame Esther Rantzen said she was ‘disappointed’ by news of Mr Streeting’s decision (Esther Rantzen/PA) (PA Media)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has said he did not intend to “wade into the debate” after he told Labour MPs he planned to vote against legalising assisted dying.

The Government is officially neutral on the Bill and MPs will have a free vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.

Dame Esther Rantzen, who is terminally ill and has been outspoken in support of change, said she felt “distressed” and “deeply disappointed” by news of Mr Streeting’s decision last week.

The Health Secretary told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “I hadn’t actually intended to wade into the debate last week. I was asked the question at a private meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party by a colleague, and I gave an honest answer.”

Explaining his stance, he said: “I’ve come down this time on voting against the Bill on the basis that I worry about palliative care, end-of-life care, not being good enough to give people a real choice.

“I worry about the risk of people being coerced into taking this route towards the end of their life.

“And I also worry, even where you’ve got really loving families who are very supportive, I really worry about those people who think they’ve almost got a duty to die to relieve the burden on their loved ones, and I’ve had to weigh those issues up against the very powerful arguments on the other side of the argument as well.”

Wes Streeting was asked if he had a message for Dame Esther.

He said: “Just to say that I’ve thought a lot about what she said and what other people have said, who I’ve met with and spoken to or received emails from over the years on this issue.

“I have a huge amount of respect for her and a lot of admiration for the campaign that she is part of.

“I have huge admiration for my colleague, Kim Leadbeater, who’s bringing the Bill forward, and ultimately it will be for Parliament to decide.

“As a Government, we will implement whatever Parliament decides.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in