Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Warranty 'rip-offs' face more criticism

Mary Fagan
Tuesday 18 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Office of Fair Trading has been asked to examine retailers' sales of extended warranties on electrical goods to see whether an investigation into the practice is necessary, writes Mary Fagan.

The move was prompted by a government request following allegations by Nigel Griffiths, Labour's consumer affairs spokesman, that the public was being 'ripped off'.

Yesterday the Consumers' Association joined the attack on extended guarantees offered by some retailers and called on the OFT to conduct an investigation.

Mr Griffiths alleges that retailers are charging much more than the manufacturers of the goods for warranties - which offer protection after the standard guarantee expires - while not informing people of the cheaper alternative.

Almost all the main electrical retailers, including Dixons and Comet, offer extended warranties and are understood to make hefty profits from them.

Stephen Locke, a spokesman for the Consumers' Association, said the OFT should investigate.

'We have been concerned about the sale of extended warranties for some time,' he said. 'In most cases it can be a very expensive way to get peace of mind.'

Dixons and Comet defended their position, saying that the warranties are more expensive than those from manufacturers because they take a different approach.

Bottom Line, page 30

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in