Vocational courses criticised
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MANY new sixth-form vocational courses introduced on the insistence of the Government are barely adequate, according to a report from Her Majesty's Inspectors.
The report, which examines a pilot of General National Vocational Qualifications in 115 schools and colleges, says the assessment of the courses needs to be more tightly controlled. Some tests were too trivial, others were too hard.
The Government wants the courses to provide a high quality vocational alternative to A-levels and says one in four 16-year-olds should be starting them by 1996. Sixth-formers in the pilot could choose courses at two levels, Intermediate, the equivalent of between four and five GCSEs, and Advanced, the equivalent of two A-levels.
John Patten, Secretary of State for Education, said in the summer that the latter should be known as vocational A-levels to help ensure they had equal status.
The inspectors found the standard of vocational A-levels was satisfactory but 'at Intermediate level, standards of work were very variable and, overall, barely satisfactory'.
The report, by the Office for Standards in Education, suggests that, while some of those awarded merit at Intermediate level did good work, many who passed did not deserve to.
Mr Patten yesterday welcomed the report and promised to iron out the problems.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments