‘Realistic’ that Putin could end up in dock over Ukraine invasion, says Brown
Former PM Gordon Brown was joined at an online event by Ukrainian foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The prospect of Vladimir Putin ending up in the dock for the crime of aggression against Ukraine is “a realistic option”, Gordon Brown has insisted.
The former prime minister called on countries to support the creation of a special tribunal to punish the Russian leader.
Ukrainian foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba said on Friday that there have been “numerous cases” of rapes in his country as the Russian invasion continues, and thanked people for their continued support of the under-fire nation.
He welcomed a call to set up a tribunal to hold Mr Putin to account for the crime of aggression against Ukraine, but admitted it was “difficult” to talk about international law amid the country’s suffering.
Speaking from Ukraine wearing a casual jumper and jacket, he said he was “sorry I may not look like a foreign minister”, as he joined an online event organised by the Chatham House think-tank.
He said: “When bombs fall on your cities, when soldiers rape women in the occupied cities – and we have numerous cases of, unfortunately, when Russian soldiers rape women in Ukrainian cities – it’s difficult of course to speak about the efficiency of the international law.
“But this is the only tool of civilisation that is available to us to make sure that, in the end, eventually, all those who made this war possible will be brought to justice and the Russian Federation, as a country that committed an act of aggression, will also be held accountable for its deeds.”
Mr Kuleba called on the media to “spread the truth about Russia’s crimes against Ukraine”.
He said: “We are fighting against the enemy who is much stronger than us.
“But international law is on our side, and hopefully it will help us, it will make its own contribution, to help us prevail.”
Mr Brown, who also addressed the event, said the plan to set up a new international tribunal is modelled on the actions of the nations which met in London during the Second World War to draft a resolution on Nazi war crimes, which led to the creation of the International Military Tribunals and the Nuremberg trials.
If we were to acquiesce in any way, none of us could ever take freedom or democracy for granted ever again
The former Labour leader said a new international tribunal is needed as well as existing international investigations by the International Criminal Court.
Mr Brown said: “President Putin has posed a fateful challenge to the post-1945 international order. He has sought to replace the rule of law with a misuse of force.
“If we were to acquiesce in any way, none of us could ever take freedom or democracy for granted ever again.”
He said he believes it is “a realistic option” that Mr Putin could end up at a tribunal, adding that governments in the European Union, some Baltic states as well as the UK have all been contacted about the idea of a setting up the legal mechanism.
He said: “I hope they are looking at it with an eye to making a decision to support this but they’re certainly looking at this with a great deal of care and resilience in the way that they are wanting to find ways to deal with this problem.”
The proposal Mr Brown is supporting seeks to address a gap in the international legal infrastructure. It has been formulated by senior international legal experts including Philippe Sands QC, director of the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London.
I think one of the ideas would be that those in the inner circle might at some point say to themselves ‘Do I really want to be associated with this?'
The lawyers are demanding that the UK and other countries join Ukraine to grant jurisdiction to a dedicated criminal tribunal to investigate both the perpetrators of the crime of aggression and those complicit in that crime.
Mr Brown added: “Currently the ICC can investigate crimes against humanity, genocide and war crimes. As evidence mounts acts against innocent civilians including children and the use of vapour bombs, it may be that Russia can be prosecuted for these crimes.
“But we lack a crucial extra weapon in the legal fight against Putin, because Russia has not signed up to a separate ICC statute under which nations pledge not to commit so-called ‘crimes of aggression’. We need the special tribunal.
“Mr Kuleba wants us to act and I believe we must do so now. Putin must not be able to escape justice.”
Echoing Mr Brown’s belief that Putin could face justice, Mr Sands said if there is “political will” it is possible to set up tribunals, citing the “horrors of Yugoslavia and Rwanda” as examples of where this had been possible.
On the prospect of Mr Putin ending up “in the dock”, the professor of law at University College London and practising barrister said it might have at one stage been “unimaginable that Nazi leaders like Hermann Goering and others would find themselves in the dock” and yet it happened.
He suggested those closest to Putin might at some stage “break ranks” to assist in investigations into war crimes.
He said: “In 1945, the imminence of the the creation of the Nuremburg tribunal was the basis for negotiations with some very senior people around Adolf Hitler which caused them to cut deals and to avoid prosecution themselves.
“And I think one of the ideas would be that those in the inner circle might at some point say to themselves ‘Do I really want to be associated with this? Am I willing to break ranks, and am I willing to assist in these investigations?’
“Who knows? But it’s not impossible.”