University escapes censure after appeal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A FORMER polytechnic has narrowly escaped having one of its departments labelled 'unsatisfactory' under a new inspection system for universities, it emerged yesterday, writes Fran Abrams.
Inspectors who visited the mechanical engineering department at the University of Greenwich, formerly Thames Polytechnic, found that standards were unsatisfactory.
However, the university has appealed successfully and a report on Friday will say the department has been given a clean bill of health.
The mechanical engineering department at Greenwich has 110 undergraduates out of 8,500 in the university. When a team from the Higher Education Funding Council for England visited in May 1993, they reported there were too few qualified staff and that some lectures were not demanding enough.
They also said courses did not meet standards laid down, the syllabus did not meet its declared aims and objectives, and some exam questions, particularly in finals, were too easy.
Greenwich argued that the inspectors visited at the end of term when several laboratories were closed and when lectures were purely for revision purposes. The council agreed that there had been 'exceptional circumstances' and repeated the inspection in January of this year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments