Unions ready to fight 'Mum's Army' plan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
MINISTERS were heading for a new confrontation with teachers last night as two of the three biggest teaching unions revealed plans not to co-operate with a planned reform of training, writes Fran Abrams.
Government plans to introduce one-year training courses for non- graduate infant teachers - dubbed 'Mum's Army' proposals because they are expected to attract women returning from career breaks - have met with universal opposition.
Trainees would be expected to have had relevant experience, which could include raising children.
The 145,000-strong Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) has ordered its members to withhold support from these new teachers, and has asked them to lobby school governors not to employ them.
Meryl Thompson, head of the ATL's policy unit, said: 'The Government will find no support for these proposals. They represent a serious threat to standards of education in our primary schools.'
The National Association of Schoolmasters/Union of Women Teachers, which has 190,000 members, will discuss similar action next month.
Head teachers are also likely to oppose the plans. The National Association of Head Teachers, of which most primary heads are members, said in its response to the proposals that schools would be 'most unwise' to take part in the scheme.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments