Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Union fires warning shot in Labour battle: Head of GMB urges party's leadership candidates to endorse policy of full employment. Barrie Clement reports

Barrie Clement
Sunday 22 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A SENIOR union leader yesterday delivered a coded warning to 'modernisers' who may run for the Labour Party leadership.

Speaking at the Welsh Labour conference in Swansea, John Edmonds, general secretary of the GMB general union, urged candidates to endorse a 'vote-winning' policy of full employment. Although Mr Edmonds declined to name senior politicians who might benefit from such strictures, his assertions will be seen by many in the labour movement as a shot across the bows of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Both shadow ministers argue in favour of full employment, but trade unionists are more sceptical about their commitment to such a goal compared with other, more left-wing potential candidates such as Margaret Beckett - presently the acting leader - John Prescott and Robin Cook.

Mr Edmonds' union yesterday published the findings of an opinion poll which showed that 86 per cent of voters thought full employment was an important policy.

Another showed Labour could gain an 8.5 per cent swing from the Conservatives if it made full employment a major issue.

The 4.5 million trade unionists who pay the political levy would also be interested to hear the candidates' views on issues such as the minimum wage, employment and pension rights, and the role unions should play in the Labour Party.

Under the new electoral college which will determine John Smith's successor, levy payers will command one-third of the votes. The rest will be divided equally between party members in the constituencies, MPs and MEPs.

Mr Edmonds said: 'The GMB will encourage candidates to recognise this enormous test of opinion and reflect issues of concern to trade unionists in their campaign.'

One central issue in the debate which will be sparked by the GMB is precisely what is meant by 'full employment'. Mr Edmonds' aides argue that a figure of 3 per cent unemployment - compared with the present official figure of about 10 per cent - is the target.

Research for the GMB surveys was conducted before the death of Mr Smith and they were aimed at influencing the European elections. However the timing of their release means that at least one 'union baron' will be keen to influence the outcome of the Labour leadership election. One GMB source said that Mr Edmonds was simply 'drawing a line in the sand and saying don't cross it'.

Mr Edmonds, in common with other union leaders, has shown a marked reluctance to name any favoured candidate. The GMB executive will meet ahead of its annual congress in three weeks' time and will decide whether to recommend a 'ticket' for the leadership.

Bill Jordan, president of the Amalgamated Engineering and Electrical Union, said Labour already espoused a policy of full employment and senior party figures were all committed to it.

There was a need to avoid a 'personal dogfight' and there was also a need to elect a person who sounded like a leader and looked like a winner.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in