Union fails to agree rail peace formula
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A THIRD 24-hour rail strike was in prospect for next week after the industry's largest union failed to agree a peace formula put forward by management.
After an acrimonious four-hour meeting yesterday, the executive of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union encountered what was described as a 'constitutional problem' and did not accept or reject British Rail's proposals.
One possibility was that the conciliation service Acas would be brought in to solve the dispute over job security, an RMT spokesman said. The union would consider its position further today, he said.
Earlier yesterday, the Government intervened in the dispute, warning the rail union that the BR management had come to the end of the negotiating line.
Urging the RMT against a third 24-hour strike, John MacGregor, the Secretary of State for Transport, said: 'I don't think they can go further. I don't think it would be right to do so.'
His comments came before last night's critical meeting of the RMT executive, which was considering a peace formula issued by British Rail on Tuesday. In the document, management confirmed that it did not foresee the need for compulsory redundancies during the next couple of years.
It also assured the union that there were no plans for a major extension of the use of contractors for track maintenance.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments