TV 'undermines politicians': The British Psychological Society's conference in London
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE DESIRE of BBC television journalists to achieve balance in political reporting ends up with them persuading viewers that politicians from neither side of the argument can be believed, a research psychologist said.
At the same time, the politicians' lack of credibility, already at an 'alarmingly low ebb', enhances the authority of the news programmers, Paul Dickerson, a psychology lecturer at Roehampton Institute of Further Education in south-west London, said.
He told the meeting: 'The high reputation of trustworthiness enjoyed by programmes like the Nine O'Clock News may therefore depend partly on production techniques that systematically undermine the credibility of politicians.'
He added that the 'techniques whilst rendering the news authoritative and accessible serve to undermine the legitimacy of claims made by politicians in general'.
After analysing five lead items on the Nine O'Clock News last May it was clear that the main technique for establishing independence and objectivity was to present several perspectives of the issue under discussion.
Mr Dickerson warned that these were subtle choices on the part of programme-makers and that, unlike newspapers which run leading articles which state their position, the television news programmes suggested that their approach was 'commonsensical' when in fact other choices could have been made. 'The viewer may not be aware of this.'
He said techniques used to establish the programmes' authoritativeness - the use of experts in the studio - tacitly implied that claims made by politicians could not be taken at face value.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments