Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Thorp report suppressed by ministers

Geoffrey Lean
Saturday 11 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MINISTERS have been sitting for four months on an official report that undermines the case for the controversial Thorp reprocessing plant.

Senior civil servants say privately that publication of the report, part of which has been seen by the Independent on Sunday, has been held up to avoid embarrassing the Government, which will almost certainly give the go-ahead for the pounds 2.8bn plant this week.

Officials also admitted last week that key government departments failed to ask British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) for crucial documents about its plant throughout a year of 'public consultation' on its future.

A Conservative MP who was permanent private secretary to one of the Cabinet ministers making the decision is now demanding a public inquiry.

The suppressed report, on ministers' desks since August, gives unprecedented backing to the 'dry storage' of nuclear fuel, the alternative to reprocessing which Thorp's opponents have advocated for nearly two decades.

The report is embarrassing to the Government on two counts. It contradicts part of the case that ministers have put for Thorp. And it is the result of a public inquiry - which environmentalists are demanding before a final decision. The little-noticed inquiry - which opened in Dunbar, Lothian, more than a year ago - was held into an application by Scottish Nuclear, one of Thorp's biggest customers, to build dry storage for used fuel at its Torness station. Instead of being sent to Sellafield to be reprocessed into plutonium, uranium and nuclear waste, it would be stored.

Environmentalists have been arguing for dry storage since the mid-1970s because it causes less pollution and avoids the risk of nuclear proliferation.

While publicly supporting Thorp, Scottish Nuclear in fact plans to stop using the plant in 1996, and to store all its spent fuel instead. Robin Jeffrey, its managing director, says this would save his firm pounds 45m a year and 'bring down the cost of nuclear electricity in the UK'.

The inspector, R M Hickman, submitted his report to Ian Lang, the Scottish Secretary, in August. Scottish Nuclear says that it is 'confident' that the report comes down in favour of dry storage, and a senior civil servant said last week it was being suppressed 'because it would be very embarrassing if it came out at this stage'.

In his 'findings of fact', seen by the Independent on Sunday, the inspector refutes two key arguments in the case for Thorp - that reprocessing makes it easier to dispose of nuclear waste, and that even stored fuel would be reprocessed at some stage.

Dr Patrick Green, Nuclear Campaigner for Friends of the Earth, said last week: 'The Government's suppression of the report has kept from the public vital information which calls the whole basis of Thorp into question. It shows that its public consultation is a sham.'

Tory MP Julian Brazier, who was parliamentary private secretary to Gillian Shephard, is calling for a public inquiry after reading in the Independent on Sunday that a Pentagon report concluded that Thorp would greatly increase the risk of nuclear proliferation.

BNFL says it abides by all national and international requirements for plutonium shipment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in