Thorp challenge given go-ahead: Permission granted for judicial review
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GREENPEACE and Lancashire County Council yesterday won the right legally to challenge the Government's authorisation for the Thorp nuclear reprocessing plant.
Mr Justice John Laws allowed a judicial review hearing which will take place early next month in the High Court and last five days. The environmental pressure group and the council argue that ministers should have ordered a public inquiry before granting the controversial pounds 2.8bn plant authorisation last month to discharge radioactive pollution into the environment.
British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL), which owns and operates the plant at Sellafield, west Cumbria, and Greenpeace both said they were pleased with the outcome of yesterday's hearing. Neither the Government nor BNFL opposed a judicial review.
The company said it intended to start operations on Monday - the date agreed under the authorisation granted on 15 December.
The plan is to move 3 tons of spent fuel from a storage pond to a feed pond, where it will remain for 30 days while instruments are checked and callibrated. After that, it will be cut into small pieces and dissolved in acid to separate the reusable uranium and plutonium from highly radioactive waste material.
Greenpeace said it was satisfied with BNFL's undertaking that this would not cause major contamination.
Greenpeace's executive director, Peter Melchett, said: 'I'm delighted. We got what we want - a judicial review which will take place quickly, before Thorp starts contaminating operations.'
If Greenpeace loses and decides to appeal, it will seek a legal block on further operations until a final decision from the courts. Thorp was completed two years ago but has been standing idle, awaiting authorisation. BNFL claims the delay is costing pounds 2m a week.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments