Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'You wonder if it would be better if your cattle had foot-and-mouth'

Cahal Milmo
Sunday 05 August 2001 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Peter Vasey's farm is surrounded by the empty fields of neighbours whose animals have been culled. Sometimes, he wonders if it would be better if his 130 pedigree cattle were among those slaughtered.

Mr Vasey, 54, has not been able to sell a single beast from his Charolais herd since February, reducing the income from his farm near Carlisle – in the heart of the crisis – to nothing.

In this confused world of foot-and-mouth slaughter and compensation claims, Mr Vasey has heard of fellow Cumbrian farmers who are receiving £1m-plus government payouts.

But the whispers offer little comfort to a farmer whose land has remained free of the foot-and-mouth plague but finds himself unable to move his animals or make a living because of the government-imposed "bio-safety" restrictions.

"There will be farmers out there whose herds were worth a lot of money and who deserve to be compensated for the loss of those animals," he said.

"But that is of little comfort. We cannot move the animals, put them in calf or sell them. We have no income. Like most in this position, you wonder if it would be better if your cattle had foot-and-mouth."

Mr Vasey is under no illusions about the devastating effects of the disease.

For 10 days in April , the carcasses of a neighbour's sheep flock lay slaughtered in a field adjoining his property. He lives in an area officially designated a foot-and-mouth "hot spot".

In defiance of scientific convention that animals being kept outside in an infected zone were more likely to catch the disease, Mr Vasey's Charolais herd grazing in his fields have escaped infection.

But the stringent movement restrictions imposed by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs now mean that Mr Vasey cannot sell his animals more than six kilometres from his farm.

Further safety measures have been imposed and mean he cannot mate the herd to put the cows in calf for next year and start a recovery.

As a result, he is facing the complete loss of two years' business with only minimal support from the state.

Like many in the farming fraternity, he has heard stories about livestock owners who are desperate to get out of an unprofitable industry and are deliberately infecting their animals with foot-and-mouth.

Equally, he has been told of rumours that an infected sheep can be "hired" for £2,000.

But he says he is not interested. He said: "I know I have been very lucky to escape with a herd that has taken me 25 years to build. But, at the moment, the only thing keeping me going is pride."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in