Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Water firms to claim millions over rivers

Graham Mole
Saturday 18 November 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Water companies are demanding hundreds of millions of pounds from the taxpayer in return for stopping taking water from the UK's drought-stricken rivers.

Some 39 rivers face serious problems as they become what the Environment Agency (EA) calls "over-abstracted". Put simply, too much water is being taken out of them. The water companies are allowed to take huge amounts of water out of rivers for nothing, under agreements made 40 years ago, long before climate change led to repeated drought warnings.

Southern Water last year took 30 per cent of Hampshire's river Test. In August when the river was at its very lowest, the company increased its take to about 40 per cent.

If the EA wants the companies to stop taking water, the utilities are legally entitled to demand compensation from the taxpayer if they have to spend money finding alternative sources.

Water industry figures now say they will demand £2m for each million litres they are banned from taking. A spokesman for the water regulator Ofwat said: "The figure of £1m to £2m is what is being discussed."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in