Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rural protesters lose asylum centre fight

Nigel Morris,Home Affairs Correspondent
Thursday 28 October 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The much-delayed scheme to build Britain's first accommodation centre for asylum-seekers in the Oxfordshire countryside was approved yesterday after a bitter battle between the Government and protesters.

The much-delayed scheme to build Britain's first accommodation centre for asylum-seekers in the Oxfordshire countryside was approved yesterday after a bitter battle between the Government and protesters.

Three years ago, David Blunkett, the Home Secretary, announced plans for a network of centres to take the pressure of dealing with asylum-seekers off London and other major cities.

Council-backed residents have fought a two-year campaign against the proposed complex near Bicester, claiming it would lead to an influx of "criminals and perverts". But their attempt to overturn the decision by John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, to give the project planning permission was rejected yesterday by the Court of Appeal.

It upheld a High Court ruling that Mr Prescott had done nothing wrong in law when he approved the scheme. Des Browne, the Immigration minister, said he recognised residents' concerns, but he did not believe the proposal would be a "detriment to the community". He said accommodation centres would be an essential way of helping to ensure ensure asylum applications were processed quickly and effectively.

Dionne Arrowsmith, of the Bicester Action Group, said: "This decision is completely and utterly disappointing for many thousands of local people. We've fought a very long campaign and we are absolutely gutted."

Cherwell council is considering an appeal to the Lords. Its leader, Barry Wood, said: "We felt we had to stand behind the local people and fight an injustice. The planning inspector said no but the Government just bulldozed it through."

In 2002, the Home Office submitted its proposals to Cherwell council to house up to 750 asylum-seekers in a purpose-built site on former Ministry of Defence land. It could hold 400 single men, 50 single women and 300 family members.

The centre will have health and educational facilities. Asylum-seekers will stay for up to six months while their claims are assessed. They will get a small allowance and, although they will be free to come and go, they will be expected to stay overnight.

The Home Office has awarded the contract to operate it to Global Solutions UK Ltd, formerly Group 4. It is due to be running by mid-2006.

Mr Blunkett floated the idea of four such centres, but the initiative has struggled in the face of opposition from residents. Mr Prescott vetoed plans to turn the former Newton RAF base in Bingham, near Nottingham, into a centre and the Home Office has scrapped a proposal to house 400 single men at the disused HMS Daedalus air base at Lee-on-the-Solent, Hampshire.

Tony Baldry, the Tory MP whose Banbury constituency includes Bicester, said: "This is deeply disappointing. It will disappoint local residents who have every reason to be worried. And it will disappoint refugees after the dire warnings of every welfare organisation. Ministers have bulldozed through this friendless policy and made a mockery of planning democracy."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in