Pay-out for widowers who sued over 'sexist' benefits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two men who sued the Government for sexism after being denied social security payments designed for widows have accepted an out-of-court settlement.
David Cornwell will be given £11,904.60p and John Leary £12,226.20p in back payments, plus weekly benefits, after agreeing to drop their case in the European Court of Human Rights.
The "friendly settlement" means ministers have avoided the embarrassment of being judged as sexist by the court, and of breaching the European Human Rights Convention. It also avoids the possibility of the Department of Social Security being ordered to make mass payments to large numbers of widowed men until the law is changed.
The Government has effectively admitted that the current benefit rules are sexist. The anomaly is due to be removed when the Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill becomes law later this year, when the weekly payments to Mr Cornwell and Mr Leary will also end.
The men sued the Government after discovering only women were entitled to two statutory benefits, the widowed mothers allowance and a widows payment, under the Social Security and BenefitsAct 1992.
Mr Cornwell's wife died in 1989, leaving him caring for their 18-month old son, and in 1997 he contacted the Benefits Agency. Mr Leary's wife died in 1997, leaving him caring for three daughters.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments