Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Legalising drugs 'may be the only answer'

Report suggests tough approach causes more harm than good

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Wednesday 29 March 2000 18:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Illegal drug use is spiralling out of control in Britain and the Government's repressive approach to the problem may be causing more harm than good, a group of leading doctors said yesterday.

The inexorable rise in drug addiction, up fourfold in a decade, is unlikely to be halted by government initiatives and, as drug use spreads, support for punitive policies is likely to wane. The pressure for "some form of legalisation" may then prove irresistible, a report by two Royal medical colleges says.

Published a day after the Police Foundation called for a softer line on hard drugs and the decriminalisation of cannabis possession the new report seeks to open a wider debate on the social and economic costs of drug use. It says the huge sums generated by the drugs trade, and the potential benefits these could bring, may ultimately be seen to outweigh the harm caused and swing public opinion behind demands for legalisation.

Despite expenditure of £1.4bn a year on efforts to control the drugs problem, heroin has fallen in price by 50 per cent in real terms over the last 20 years and is purer. Seizures of heroin have risen from around 300 a year in the mid-1970s to more than 12,000 in 1997, and convictions for cannabis offences have risen from fewer than 20,000 to almost 100,000 a year. The number of registered addicts rose from 10,716 in 1987 to 43,372 in 1996.

Dr Robert Kendall, former president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists and chairman of the joint working party with the Royal College of Physicians that produced the report Drugs: Dilemmas and Choices, said: "These are pretty terrifying figures and they have all the hallmarks of a problem spiralling out of control."

Calling for more funds to be diverted to treatment, with an immediate 50 per cent increase in places for heroin addicts, the report says it is more likely that drug taking will increase than reduce over the next two or three decades, despite government targets to halve the proportion of young people using heroin and cocaine by 2008. If that happened, "electorates and governments would be bound to conclude sooner or later that polices that were failing, decade after decade, must be changed." The most obvious alternative was "some form of legalisation" although this could take many forms.

Dr Kendall said legalising a drug made it more likely that it would be used. That was why there were 30,000 deaths a year from alcohol, 120,000 from tobacco and at most 2,000 from all illegal drugs combined.

"Making a drug illegal is a relatively effective way of minimising the number who use it," he said, "but the price we pay is the creation of a massive criminal industry that imposes all sorts of costs of theft, corruption and money laundering. Society can choose which kind of problem it prefers."

The report says the international trade in drugs generates between $1,500bn (£900bn) and $5,000bn a year. "It may be the implications of this for the world economy, rather than crime rates, ... that finally persuades governments that radical change is needed," it says.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in