Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Drinkers may have to work more hours

Anna Whitney
Sunday 30 April 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A London borough plans to discourage its employees from having a leisurely pint at lunch by forcing them to stay late to make up for lost time.

Labour-run Tower Hamlets council is reviewing its policy on midday drinking after councillors pushed through a vote forcing workers who smoke to stay an extra half hour at the end of each day to make up for their smoking breaks.

Although the report is not due for months, the anti-alcohol proposal has already stirred up opposition. Janet Ludlow, the council's Liberal Democrat leader, said an attack on drinking during the working day would be demoralising.

It would mean "people working in the town hall aren't trusted," she said. "What does it do to a working team's relationship not to be able to socialise?

"I'm not saying 'go out and down two bottles of wine each' - there is, naturally, common sense involved - but people should be trusted," she said. "It's getting to be a nanny state in the council at the moment."

The anti-smoking measure, to be implemented in October, will cost one of the poorest boroughs in Britain up to £10,000 to introduce. Barrie Duffey, a Liberal Democrat councillor, said: "Surely there must be more pressing issues in this borough for us to be dealing with?"

A spokesman for the council said the new smoking rule was being opposed by the union.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in