Care agencies failed but will not be blame in case of murdered Laura, says report
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Care agencies failed to investigate properly the parental neglect of murdered schoolgirl Laura Kane, an inquiry revealed yesterday.
Care agencies failed to investigate properly the parental neglect of murdered schoolgirl Laura Kane, an inquiry revealed yesterday.
The nine-year-old was on Sunderland council's child protection register when she was abducted, raped and murdered by a family friend, Colin Bainbridge, last August. He was jailed for life two months ago at Newcastle.
Laura's family had been monitored by various agencies for 10 years. The inquiry into her death - standard practice after a child on the register dies - found concerns about parenting were "not followed up consistently and family standards remained unchallenged. The nature and extent of the neglect was much greater than was recognised".
The report, by an independent expert from Sunderland's multi-agency area child protection committee, said nothing could have been done to save Laura from the man who killed her.
"Whatever help the family were receiving, none of the agencies involved could have predicted this act of murder," the expert decided.
Lauralived with six brothers and sisters with their mother, 37-year-old Carol Kane in a two-bedroom terraced house near Sunderland.
The council's director of social services John Marsden said: "Care workers had failed to spot warning signs because of the family's circumstances.
"Poverty masked the abuse and neglect and people could not see ... what was going on in the family."No one had been disciplined and no individual was to blame for deficiencies in handling the case, he said.
The report set out 23 recommendations to improve the monitoring of at risk children, including steps to better collate the vast amount of information about families such as Laura's.
At Mrs Kane's request, her six remaining children were taken into care - the first time any of them had been removed from her - because she could not cope.
Yesterday, Mrs Kane insisted she was a good parent.
"I love all my children and as a single mum I looked after them to the best of my ability," she said."Nothing could have been done to prevent that evil man from getting to my little girl, but I resent the fact that they're saying I'm a bad parent."
Mrs Kane said she now wanted her children back, but that is unlikely to be soon.
Mr Marsden said: "Prompted by signals from the children and further investigations... there is no intention in the near future to return the children to their family environment."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments