Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Byers promises safeguards for rural post offices

Sarah Schaefer,Political Reporter
Wednesday 12 April 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Stephen Byers promised to safeguard the future of rural post offices yesterday as the Government cane under pressure from all sides to prevent their closure.

The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry said he would amend the Postal Services Bill next week in an attempt to provide a mechanism for financial assistance. He said: "This will enable the Secretary of State to set up a financial scheme to ensure that essential services can still be delivered through a nationwide network of local post offices.

"Our key target is that there will be a viable future for the network. It may well be that in the future, because of changes which are being introduced, financial assistance should be offered to the network." Under the subsidy proposal, the Government would be able to give financial help if the economic and social impact of a post office's closure would merit it.

Earlier, the Prime Minister told benefit claimants and pensioners that no one would be prevented from receiving their payments in cash at post offices, despite the switch to electronic transfers in 2003.

Speaking after the presentation in Downing Street of a massive petition against post office closures, Mr Blair said during Question Time that his pledge applied to weekly as well as monthly benefit payments. But the Tory leader William Hague dismissed his comments as "meaningless reassurances" and called on ministers to think again by opting instead for an earlier, Conservative, scheme of benefit swipe cards. He said: "We had a policy to save post offices, you have a policy to close post offices."

Mr Hague said thousands of sub-postmasters had brought the petition to London because the Government was presiding over "a record number of closures and a threat to thousands more post offices".

"Will you now listen to this wholly reasonable campaign for people to be able to receive benefits and pensions in cash at post offices without the compulsory use of bank accounts and introduce a proper swipe card system?" Mr Hague said.

Replying, Mr Blair insisted: "The Conservative government closed 3,000 post offices. They planned to privatise the Post Office and still plan to privatise the Post Office. Of course we all want to see post offices thrive. But we have to make sure that is done against the background of necessary modernisation.

"More people are going to want to draw their pensions, child benefit and other benefits, via their bank accounts. However, let me make one thing absolutely clear. No one will be prevented from still receiving their benefit in cash at the post office if they want to - and not just monthly, but weekly."

The Government adopted plans to spend £500m on providing rural post offices with computer facilities after it emerged that the Horizon scheme proved too inefficient and costly. Mr Blair said: "The last government did not actually introduce this system and let me tell the House why. When we came to office there was probably no greater shambles than that Horizon project.

"It was three years behind schedule. It was going to cost hundreds of millions of pounds more than the system we have got and it is a cruel deception of people in post offices to pretend that provided an answer."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in