Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Manipulation of Birth: How the authority puts the case for and against

Friday 22 January 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has set out the following arguments in its consultative document.

Sex selection of babies should not be allowed because:

Sex selection would upset the balance of males and females which are produced by nature;

Many who have religious beliefs feel that the determination of sex is divine. Humans should not seek to 'play God';

Sex selection could place undesirable emphasis on the value of either sex;

It is a slippery slope towards selecting children for specific characteristics, such as hair or eye colour;

Buying a selection service could reduce children to consumer goods. A child could be valued for its sex rather than itself.

Selection should be allowed because:

People should be allowed to exercise as much free will over their lives as possible;

If medical science allows a new choice, without harm, people should be able to exercise it;

Throughout history people have sought to reduce their dependence on the environment and upon chance;

Accepting the lottery of natural sex determination cannot be said to be morally superior to exercising choice;

A child who is the 'right' sex would be greatly loved and valued.

Sex Selection; Public Consultation Document; Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Paxton House, 30 Artillery Lane, London SE1 7LS; free.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in