The Labour Party in Blackpool: Unions defy NEC call in family poverty vote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.First Edition
Several unions defied the Labour National Executive yesterday as a recommendation to put on hold a controversial and costly proposal to help families on the poverty line came close to defeat, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.
The motion called for child benefit to be disregarded when calculating income support, effectively treating the families in the same way as others who receive the universal benefit, regardless of their earnings or income. It also urged that families on income support should retain half of any maintenance payments before benefit was cut.
The 2,746,000 to 2,565,000 card vote, the first of the conference, shows that several unions used the block vote in favour of the reform, despite a recommendation from the executive that it should be referred back for further consideration.
Labour's high command believes the policy is premature until John Smith's social justice commission has been set up, and would cost pounds 700m a year.
Robin Cook, shadow Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, told the Building a Strong Economy dabate that the motion would mean families out of work would receive a double payment for children.
'This would dramatically deepen the poverty trap as those families would see support for their children halved on returning to employment,' he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments