The Labour Party in Blackpool: The clause that can bring forth division again
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE HALLOWED wording of Clause IV, Tony Blair's modernisation target, was part of the constitution for the party drawn up in 1918, most of which is normally attributed to Sydney and Beatrice Webb, writes Donald Macintyre.
It declares a commitment 'to secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry, and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service'.
In the aftermath of the traumatic 1959 election defeat, Hugh Gaitskell, against the advice of some of his closest allies on the right of the party, sought to replace the clause as Mr Blair is seeking to do. But eventually he backed off in the wake of furious left-wing opposition and lack of enthusiasm from allies such as Sam Watson, the famous Durham miners' leader, himself on the right of the party.
During the infighting, it was revealed that Arthur Henderson, the deputy leader of the party in the 1920s, had questioned the relevance of the 1918 clause less than a decade after it was introduced.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments