Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The facts about the Serious Fraud Office

Tim Kelsey
Friday 03 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

What is the Serious Fraud Office? Set up in 1987 to tackle booming white collar fraud, particularly in the City, it is the first body of its kind in British legal history to have investigators who can also act as prosecutors. It has extraordinary powers to collect evidence (it can seize documents without making a court appearance), and to question suspects (unlike police, it does not have to go through the normal caution process).

Who works there? How much does it cost? Its present director, George Staple, a former City solicitor, reports to the Attorney General. There are about 130 full-time staff, mostly lawyers and accountants. There are 45 to 55 policemen from the Metropolitan and City of London forces. Cost: pounds 22m in 1992-93 - a 23 per cent rise on 1991-92; the value of fraud investigated was pounds 6.2bn.

Why has it got such a bad reputation? It failed to secure convictions in a number of high-profile cases and critics accuse it of incompetence. A judge ruled yesterday that three stockbrokers accused of fraud had no case to answer. Last week, Roger Levitt, a financial adviser, admitted fraudulent trading but was sentenced to just 180 hours' community service after a plea bargain with SFO. Terry Ramsden walked free after admitting pounds 90m fraud. The second Guinness trial collapsed last year, as did the Blue Arrow trial. The Independent disclosed yesterday that the relationship between some police officers working for SFO and an informer is now the subject of investigation; and that confidential information on another case was passed from the SFO to City solicitors - the same firm for which George Staple had been head of litigation.

Any successes? It brought Peter Clowes to court. There has been a rise in the rate of successful fraud prosecutions to around 70 per cent of cases tried.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in