Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The croak-voiced dalek label is lyrical but wrong, says Birt

David Lister,Media Correspondent
Saturday 28 August 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOHN BIRT, director-general of the BBC, last night vigorously defended the way he runs the corporation after being labelled a 'croak-voiced dalek' who had caused hatred, bitterness and demoralisation among his employees.

Speaking at the Edinburgh Television Festival Mr Birt said he did not recognise the description of the BBC given on Friday by the dramatist Dennis Potter who had opened the festival.

Asked whether he was hurt by the personal criticism, he said: 'I don't think my old mum would agree with much of it. Dennis Potter's speech was powerfully argued, wonderfully poetic and lyrical. But it told a story of the BBC which was bleakly pessimistic and had no basis in reality. We are in a strong and healthy condition.'

Mr Birt accepted that changes in the corporation introduced by him had been painful but added: 'We were an over-large inefficient institution with too much capacity. But the changes have had the impact of putting pounds 100m into programmes which would not otherwise be there.'

For the first time, the director-general alluded in public to his feelings about the personal criticism he has received this year, both over his self-employed tax arrangements - he has since joined the BBC staff - and more recently from the veteran India correspondent Mark Tully who suggested that BBC employees live in fear.

'It's not a lot of fun,' said Mr Birt, 'when these attacks are so personal but you have got to keep your eye on the ball and not worry about what's in the papers.'

When there was a reference to the wealth of executives at LWT following the realisation of share options, Mr Birt turned to Greg Dyke, its chief executive who was in the audience, and said: 'Which would you prefer, pounds 7m or national vilification.'

Mr Birt predicted that the licence fee would be the big issue for the BBC in the autumn and promised that he would be arguing fiercely that its value needed to be retained.

At one point in the discussion a woman working for children's television made an emotional plea for a 'figurehead' to lead the staff 'with the camaraderie we need to go forward'. Mr Birt replied: 'I care very strongly, because of the generation I came from and the time I grew up, about collaborating with colleagues and I have had so many collaborative, creative and fertile relationships.'

But there were jeers when he added: 'I would like to wean the BBC away from bureaucracy. There are far fewer bureaucrats in the BBC now than a few years ago.'

Another questioner said that the BBC was now giving staff self-assessment forms. What would Mr Birt write on his? He replied: 'I would like to say I have helped create an enormously strong management team and that we have seized the initiative in the Charter review.'

He admitted, however, that on programming he was very worried about drama, on British television generally. 'Something has gone wrong,' he said. 'The originality is not there as it was in the Sixties.'

But 'in other areas we are firing on all creative cylinders'. Comedy, with Absolutely Fabulous, One Foot In The Grave, Keeping Up Appearances, and French and Saunders was 'going through a golden period'.

Asked why he and the BBC would not listen more to the public - who appeared not to want a 24-hour rolling news radio and did not agree with changes to Gardener's Question Time - Mr Birt said: 'We do listen. We go to public meetings. We conduct audience research.

'The BBC arouses high passions. There is always a great national debate about what the BBC is doing. We can always do better. The audience says there are too many repeats in the summer and who is to say they are not right? We need the savings to feed back.'

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in