The Conservative Party in Blackpool: Warning over new curbs on press
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A CONSERVATIVE supporter yesterday warned the Government against legislation to curb the press, and defended disclosures about the private lives of MPs, including David Mellor.
'MPs are free to have affairs if they wish. After all, it seems to be the male ones that do it, and boys will be boys,' Sally Illman, from Bristol South, told the conference.
'But if those affairs conflict with their public image, carefully cultivated, of marital harmony, they really cannot complain when the press catch them in their boxer shorts. To censor such reporting would make our press no better than the French, which is scared of its own shadow. Surely we don't want that.'
She said recent press 'successes' included the exposure of Asil Nadir's alleged plot to bribe a judge and the reports on the Catholic bishop Eammon Casey, who used church funds to pay off the mother of his illegitimate child and buy her silence.
'All of these stories should be known in a mature democracy. None would have been published under a privacy law . . . To gag the press by cumbersome statute would be wrong, damaging to the press, insulting to readers' intelligence and harmful to democracy. It would be a foolish error of political judgement and we would pay a hefty price.'
Peter Brooke, the Secretary of State for National Heritage, confirmed the Government was delaying its plans on privacy.
He said there would be a 'pause' before action, but the Government intended to impose a privacy law outlawing secret bugging, telephone-tapping and the invasion of privacy through long-range photography.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments