Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Age of Consent Debate: Tory MPs propose 18 compromise on age limit for gays

Patricia Wynn Davies,Political Correspondent
Tuesday 01 February 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A COMPROMISE amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill aimed at lowering the age of consent for homosexuals to 18 finally emerged yesterday.

The half-way measure, tabled by four Conservatives, was condemned by Jerry Hayes, Tory MP for Harlow, a supporter of a common age of 16 for gays and heterosexuals. He said: 'I fail to understand how one can compromise on equality. People are either equal or they are not.'

The amendment has been tabled in the names of Sir Anthony Durant (Reading), an archetypal knight of the shires, Tim Devlin (Stockton), Richard Page (Hertfordshire South West) and Spencer Batiste (Elmet) as an alternative to Edwina Currie's amendment to equalise the age.

Amid reports of a dearth of volunteers willing to put their names to the 18 compromise, accounting for its delay, there was growing confidence yesterday that Mrs Currie's amendment will scrape a majority.

One MP said of yesterday's amendment: 'This is a put-up job. MPs have been reluctant to put forward their names because the amendment is a compromise.'

In the free vote later this month the 16 option is expected to be taken first. That could increase its chances because some MPs will support it rather than risk the possibility of the 18 compromise failing to secure a majority in favour.

Equally, however, some MPs who are lukewarm about change will be content to be recorded as having voted for the compromise regardless of whether it can secure a majority.

Mr Devlin yesterday rejected the argument of Sir Ian McKellen, the actor, and gay rights organisations that a vote for 18 would be unprincipled. The proposal did not accept the argument for equality and was based on removing anomalies.

'The amendment removes the anomalies that at the age of 18 you can fight for your country, vote and get married without consent but cannot indulge in a homosexual act with another male.'

Most government ministers will support the 18 compromise favoured by Michael Howard, the Home Secretary and John Major. But virtually all the Labour Party, most of the Liberal Democrats and a sizeable minority of Tories support a common age.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in