Teachers call off test boycott after face-saving deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Teachers who have boycotted national curriculum tests for the past two years are to call off their action, it was announced yesterday.
The National Union of Teachers is asking its members carry out the tests after ministers promised to commission new studies on how the tests are working and consult teachers on the findings.
The union's members will be balloted next month, but will be told they can still refuse to carry out the tests if they mean an unreasonable workload.
The NUT, the last of the three main teaching unions to continue its boycott, was finding its position increasingly untenable. While it had argued that the tests were educationally unsound its action had to be based on workload issues to be legal, and these had largely been resolved.
The National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers called off their action after concessions on testing and the slimming down of the national curriculum.
Doug McAvoy, the NUT's general secretary, who has been looking for a way out of the dispute, met the Secretary of State for Education, Gillian Shephard, last Thursday and was offered a face-saving solution. The Government will allow teachers to give their views on its evaluation of the tests.
While ministers are unlikely to change their conviction that written tests are the best method of assessing children's and schools' performances, they may make some concessions to teachers' views. For example, the unpopular Shakespeare tests could be dropped.
Mr McAvoy hoped the Government's study would strengthen the union's campaign.
"For the first time there will be an evaluation of the professional and educational issues, whereas previously only workload was being considered by the Government. By co-operating it will be possible for us to bring detailed examples which will support the statements we have been making," he said.
Mrs Shephard was cautious about the evaluation."I have taken a series of steps to respond to teachers' concerns about workload and to enhance teachers' professionalism. I am glad that the NUT executive has responded in a professional and considered way."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments