Teachers' boycott faces court test: Council seeks injunction against union
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A HIGH COURT challenge will be mounted today against the teacher union boycotting this summer's national curriculum tests.
Tory-controlled Wandsworth council in south London yesterday served a writ on the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers seeking an injunction requiring the union to withdraw its boycott instruction. A judge in chambers will this morning decide whether to hear the case swiftly.
Edward Lister, Wandsworth's leader, said the council believed the boycott was unlawful because teachers are bound by the 1988 Education Reform Act to deliver the national curriculum and its associated tests. 'I see no reason why Wandsworth pupils should suffer as a result of the NASUWT's unlawful boycott,' he said.
Nigel de Gruchy, NASUWT general secretary, said the union had been advised by its lawyers that the dispute was lawful under the Labour and Trade Union Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, which allows employees to take action over terms and conditions being affected by decisions for which the Secretary of State is responsible. The union says national curriculum testing has placed an excessive workload on teachers and that ministers are wholly responsible.
John Patten, Secretary of State for Education, welcomed Wandworth's move. 'If we are to ensure that education standards continue to improve, we must have an accurate and reliable picture of what children are achieving. Only a system of regular tests can provide that.'
The case is likely to be heard next week. If the court finds in Wandsworth's favour, its judgment will open the way to challenges from other local authorities and governing bodies. If, however, the court decides the boycott is lawful, ministers will have to accept serious disruption to the tests.
Most NASUWT members are in secondary schools, so their action at present affects the preparation for science, maths, English and technology tests which are supposed to be given to all state school 14-year-olds in June.
Members of the National Union of Teachers, the largest teaching union, have voted in principle in favour of boycotting the English tests for 14- year-olds, but its leadership faces calls for a wider boycott at the union's annual conference at Easter. The union is expecting to conduct a ballot after Easter, with action soon after.
Leaders of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers may come under similar pressure at their conference the week before Easter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments