Teacher union outlines alternative English papers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PUPILS would be asked to imagine they were 14-year-olds in ancient Rome on the Ides of March, 44 BC, to assess their understanding of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar as part of an alternative assessment blueprint produced by teachers.
The National Union of Teachers yesterday published a paper prepared by Professor Brian Cox, head of the original government working party on English, outlining suggestions for tests which would be more acceptable to teachers.
Unlike the government tests, the tests would not be divided into tiers and 80 per cent of the marks would be allocated by teacher assessment and only 20 per cent by timed external tests. Shakespeare would be tested by a coursework assignment, instead of the Government's timed test, and teachers would be free to choose which play was studied. The assignment would include a piece of drama, a discussion of issues such as the reasons for Caesar's assassination and a piece of written work.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments