Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Sun' guilty of breaching privacy code

Maggie Brown,Media Editor
Tuesday 28 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Press Complaints Commission has ruled that the Sun newspaper was wrong to publish the address of the Oxfordshire cottage owned by Alice Straw, wife of the Labour politician Jack Straw.

Mr Straw had complained of an invasion of privacy and a threat to the family's security. The article, showing the picturesque thatched cottage, was published on 1 April.

The cottage was burgled on the night of the general election, 9 April. Mr Straw told police investigating the crime that publishing the address was an open invitation to burgle on that date.

In an adjudication published yesterday, the commission says the newspaper breached Clause Four of the press code of conduct, governing privacy.

It says that even though the addresses of prominent people are well known and publicly recorded, 'there remains a commonsense obligation upon editors to avoid endangering families by publishing their exact address unless they constitute an essential part of the story'.

The commission holds its monthly meeting today and will discuss a review of the privacy part of the code.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in