Partygate: What we’ve learned from Sue Gray’s update on her inquiry
The senior civil servant’s report was pared back because of the Metropolitan Police investigation, but it still contained major revelations.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sue Gray’s inquiry into allegations of lockdown-breaching parties at the heart of Government may have been seriously hindered by the police investigation.
But her update into the Cabinet Office investigation published on Monday still contains some damning verdicts and explosive revelations.
– Police investigating at least 12 events
Ms Gray looked into 16 separate gatherings across Downing Street and wider Government between May 15 2020 and April 16 last year.
Of those, her report sets out that the Metropolitan Police are now investigating all but four of those events.
Scotland Yard said it was investigating allegations spanning eight dates, but did not set out how many specific allegations they were looking at.
– Gatherings include PM’s birthday and event in official flat
The dozen events being looked at by officers include a “gathering in the No 10 Downing Street flat” on November 13 2020, the night Mr Johnson’s former aides Dominic Cummings and Lee Cain left their roles during a bitter power struggle.
Police were also investigating the June 19 2020 event in the Cabinet Room at No 10 to mark the Prime Minister’s 56th birthday.
Two other Downing Street gatherings that officers are inspecting took place on April 16 last year, on the eve of the Duke of Edinburgh’s funeral, when the Queen was pictured mourning alone.
– Gray held back much of what she learned
Ms Gray conceded it was “not possible at present to provide a meaningful report” about the “extensive factual information” she has unearthed about the events under police investigation while officers were continuing their work.
She decided against publishing “factual accounts” about the remaining four events, saying: “I do not feel that I am able to do so without detriment to the overall balance of the findings.”
Downing Street caved to pressure to concede it would ask Ms Gray to publish a fresh assessment after the police investigation concludes.
– Failures of leadership and too much drinking
Despite that, Ms Gray was able to conclude: “At least some of the gatherings in question represent a serious failure to observe not just the high standards expected of those working at the heart of Government but also of the standards expected of the entire British population at the time.”
She criticised “failures of leadership and judgment” in No 10 and the Cabinet Office.
“Some of the events should not have been allowed to take place. Other events should not have been allowed to develop as they did,” she added.
Ms Gray, who was for a time a pub landlady, called for a robust policy to cover drinking in Government, saying that the “excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate”.
– Pity for the ‘fall guy’
One staff member believed to have been lined up for the chop to appease public anger is Martin Reynolds, the Prime Minister’s principal private secretary sent the email inviting staff to the “bring your own booze” event in the first lockdown.
But Ms Gray has made that sacking a little bit harder by noting that with swelling staff size in No 10 the leadership structures “fragmented and complicated and this has sometimes led to the blurring of lines of accountability”.
“Too much responsibility and expectation is placed on the senior official whose principal function is the direct support of the Prime Minister. This should be addressed as a matter of priority,” Ms Gray wrote.