Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sterilising chemical 'is harming NHS staff'

Annabel Ferriman
Saturday 24 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE HEALTH of hundreds of NHS workers is being damaged by the increasing use of a dangerous sterilising chemical without proper precautions.

Nurses are developing chronic asthma, eczema and dermatitis through exposure to glutaraldehyde, which is being more widely used because of the fear of Aids and HIV infection.

Radiographers are also developing serious health problems because the chemical is used in developing X-ray film. Once someone is 'sensitised' to it, through skin contact or vapour inhalation, they usually cannot work with it again. Some staff have lost their jobs as a result.

The powerful disinfectant is particularly used for sterilising the flexible 'telescopes' used in day surgery, which are unsuitable for sterilisation by traditional heat treatment. With the rapid expansion of day cases, its use has rocketed in recent years.

'Day surgery brings tremendous benefits to patients and savings to the NHS, but it must not be developed at the expense of nurses' health,' said Christine Hancock, general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing.

'The NHS has a duty to provide a safe working environment and must not scrimp on the cost of doing so.'

The Health and Safety Executive, which issued a warning about the chemical in April, is conducting a pilot study among nurses in Bristol to discover more about the risks involved, with a view to tightening the regulations further. A study by the Society of Radiographers has already discovered that almost 1,000 of its members are suffering symptoms from fumes. Both the RCN and the other nursing union, Cohse, are fighting cases for members, claiming inadequate protection.

One victim is Kathleen Garland, 47, who is a nurse from Frimley, Surrey. 'I went to work one day a well woman and ended the day as a respiratory cripple,' she said. 'That was in October last year. I have never been so ill. My lung capacity is still down 25 per cent and there are many things I cannot do.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in