Staff are shocked by fate of flagship trust: Hospital's demise is greeted with disbelief, writes Rhys Williams
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PHILIP HARRIS House at Guy's Hospital in south London stood opulent, empty and silent. It was none the less the most articulate tribute to the disbelief in the National Health Service's flagship trust yesterday.
The pounds 140m building, scheduled to open in September, was to be Britain's most sophisticated hospital wing. Instead, under plans announced by the Secretary of State for Health, Virginia Bottomley, and along with what little else will remain of the 273- year-old hospital, it is set to become a health centre and medical school.
That St Thomas's and Guy's would unite on a single site had been expected. As Mrs Bottomley spoke in the Commons, Mary Spinks, an asthma patient who helped raise pounds 1.75m for a specialist asthma and allergy unit in Philip Harris House, said: 'It's been a long slow death and today is the funeral.'
Staff were under strict orders from the trust's public relations office not to speak to the media. A clerk in accident and emergency would not give her name, but said: 'It's more beds that London needs, not less. It's shocking what they're doing.'
Stuck to a desk was a newspaper report suggesting that one Guy's building would be converted into luxury flats. Scribbled next to it were the words: 'Built for the poor, destroyed for the rich'.
Two student nurses walked home at the end of their shift. 'I feel shocked and upset - the fact that this is it, it's really going to happen,' one said. Her colleague added: 'It's very depressing wondering where the jobs will be when we qualify. They say Guy's will move to St Thomas's, but no one can see how we will fit in.'
Professor Michael Tynan, a paediatric cardiologist, expressed 'outrage and suspicion' at the decision to move all key services to St Thomas's. 'All the expert opinion was that if there was a one- site option, it should be Guy's. All the purchasers of health care, with the exception of Wandsworth, said it should be Guy's'
Guy's had a third more floorspace and 'infinitely better communications' (it adjoins London Bridge station and sits on 20 bus routes, compared with St Thomas's five). Mr Tynan said: 'If they make the decision going against all the evidence, one is tempted to think there is some other agenda.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments