Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE PATH was clear last night for the Government to introduce bitterly contested alterations to the way solicitors are paid, after the High Court rejected an attempt by the Law Society to challenge the new system, writes Adam Sage.
Lord Justice Leggatt and Mr Justice McCullough had been asked to rule that the Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay, acted illegally and irrationally when he proposed changes to the system of payments for legal aid work in magistrates' courts.
But the judges dismissed the solicitors' arguments, adding: 'The Law Society will no doubt take stock of the wisdom of continuing this challenge - they might do better to see how the amended scheme works and then press for such changes as are required by justice.'
Afterwards, the Lord Chancellor's Department said that the changes would be introduced at the start of next month.
However, even if the Law Society takes Lord Justice Leggatt's advice and decides against appealing, Lord Mackay can still expect to find himself in court again soon. Solicitors are also seeking a judicial review of the Government's plans to cut back on eligibility for legal aid.
Yesterday's judgment hinged on the Law Society's argument that the new system of standard fees, replacing the traditional hourly rate, was illegal because lawyers would lose out in some cases, although they would gain in others.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments