Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sheffield Games finance criticised

Malcolm Pithers,Northern Correspondent
Monday 28 September 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AN OFFICIAL auditor's report into the World Student Games in Sheffield last night revealed 'serious shortcomings' over finances and the way official reports were presented to the city council.

Sheffield, which yesterday suffered a one-day strike by more than 8,000 workers, faces a loss of more than pounds 10m for staging the games, which cost pounds 147m. The city is also seriously in debt and having to come to terms with cutbacks of more than pounds 7.5m.

The official auditor's report shows that the games will cost the city millions of pounds more than originally expected and that the overspending will compound the council's 'serious financial difficulties'. The report says that the overspend can only be met by reducing jobs or services.

The auditor is particularly critical of individuals involved in the organisation of the games. He says that Ray Gridley, who was appointed in June 1990 to organise the games, did 'not fulfil the terms of his remit'.

His report also says the council's chief executive, Pamela Gordon, did not ensure 'compliance with the procedures for reporting financial and other progress'. Reporting procedures were 'poor in terms of their frequency, timing, format and content', he said.

Sheffield City Council took over responsibility for staging the games in June 1990 when the company which had been responsible previously stopped trading. The council was advised that unless it was prepared to reconsider its position on managing and financing the games there was little possibility of them going ahead.

The council had intended that there should be no cost to ratepayers with the expenditure being matched by income from grants, ticket sales, sponsorship and merchandising. In March 1991 it decided that while the objective of breaking even should be maintained, there should be a 'fallback position' in which the council's net contribution would be no greater than pounds 5m. But the deficit on the council's general fund was set provisionally in December 1991 at about pounds 10.4m. The final figure may be more than pounds 11.5m.

Ms Gordon said last night that disciplinary procedures would be considered. She said that she had no intention of resigning, and Mr Gridley was still working as director of housing for Sheffield.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in