Setback in US battle to extradite Maze escaper
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITAIN suffered a setback last night in its battle to extradite James Smyth, an alleged IRA terrorist, when a United States federal judge concluded that he would be at risk of persecution and even death on his return, writes Phil Reeves.
Judge Barbara Caulfield criticised British security forces in Northern Ireland, which she said systematically harmed and imprisoned Irish nationalists accused of offences against them. At a hearing in San Francisco, she shifted the burden of proof away from Mr Smyth, a 39-year-old Belfast man, who fled to the US after a republican mass break-out from the Maze prison in Northern Ireland 10 years ago.
In pre-trial extradition proceedings, his lawyer argued that he should not be returned because he faces the risk of political persecution. The judge decided it will now be up to the British authorities to prove that this is not the case.
Her order came after Sir Patrick Mayhew, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, refused to supply the court with government documents about the security forces in Northern Ireland.
The case is being seen as a test of the revised extradition treaty between Britain and the US. The treaty was amended in 1986 to include a clause that allows US courts to refuse to extradite anyone who may be at risk of political or religious persecution.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments