Seaman awarded war pension after 24 years
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
A MERCHANT seaman who developed an anxiety disorder after the ships on which he was serving came under bomb and torpedo attack in the Second World War yesterday won his legal battle against a 24-year-old decision not to allow him a war pension.
Marcel Brahan, 66, of Abridge, Essex, joined the merchant navy in 1941. He was in 'A1' condition, although he had been treated for the nervous condition St Vitus' dance, said Mr Justice Drake at the High Court in London.
In 1942 he was serving on the Viceroy of India when it was torpedoed. By the end of the war, Mr Brahan had served on five other ships on the Malta convoys and had come under bomb attack at Bari and Taranto. He was discharged from the navy in 1946 as unfit for service on account of psychoneurosis.
Mr Brahan, who already receives a pension for hearing loss suffered while under fire, said that his war-time experiences caused his nervous condition and so entitled him to a pension under the 1964 Mercantile Marine Scheme.
His claim was rejected by the Ministry of Social Security in 1967 on the grounds that his disability was not directly attributable to a war injury within the scheme. An appeal was also unsuccessful.
But Mr Justice Drake ruled that Mr Brahan's experiences did cause his condition and qualified him for a pension.
The judge said the pensions tribunal had used the wrong legal approach by adhering to the medical opinion that psychoneurosis arose from a personality disorder which, if it pre-dated service in the forces, could not qualify a victim of war trauma for a pension.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments